酷文首页  
站内搜索:
网站地图 | RSS订阅 | 收藏本站
经济论文
证券金融
工商管理
会计审计
法学论文
医药论文
社会论文
教育论文
计算机论文
艺术论文
哲学论文
财政税收
财务管理
公共管理
理学论文
政治论文
文学论文
工学论文
文化论文
实用文档
应用文
自考成考
演讲稿
法律文书
子栏目导行↓
网站赞助商↓
本类热点↓
本类更新↓
热门标签↓
网摘收藏↓

词义的模糊性探讨(英文)

作者:王陈成
来源:酷文网
点击:
载入中...
加入时间:2008-07-19
字体大小:[  ]

Abstract: This thesis, on the basis of the previous researches, first tends to analyzes the fetures of the fuzziness of language. Then gives a detailed comparison of such concepts as generality, ambiguity and the fuzziness of word meaning to let people have a better understanding of fuzziness. Meanwhile, the fuzziness of word meaning is aslo probed into from the perspective of semantics and pragmatics. Using fuzzy language, people may express something they have no precise words to convey their meaning clearly, or write something they can’t write lively, even something they don’t have to tell definitely. Fuzzy expressions serve a variety of social functions in coversations. One most important function is that it makes the conversation more polite, softens implicit complaints and criticisms, saving speech participants’ faces, and it is aslo used to avoid the embarrassment in conversations.

Key words: Fuzziness; Origin; Semantics; Pragmatics; Use

摘 要:以前人的研究为基础,本文首先分析了语言模糊性的特点,探讨了模糊性产生的根源,并就人们在使用中常常混淆的概括、含糊和模糊性这些概念进行了比较,使人们对语言模糊性有更深入的认识,然后从语义和语用两方面探讨了词义的模糊性。运用词义的模糊性,人们在交际中可以表达心中想说而说不明白想写却写的不够生动真实和一些并不需要表达精确的话语,能够传达会话含义,还能进行含蓄性的批评以保全说话者的脸面,缓和争论的场面并消除尴尬的氛围。

关键词:模糊性;来源;语义;语用;用途
 
Intruduction
Linguists, as time goes on, get a wider and deeper understanding of the nature of human language. During the twentieth century, especially in the past thirty years, there has been a resurgence of interest in fuzziness, in mordern linguistics, the view that words are defined clearly and seriously limited on their meanings has been replaced by the thought that it is unstableriable in words’ meaning. We find that traditionally pejorative attitudes to fuzziness have been abandoned gradually since more and more people come to realize the indispensability and communicative value of fuzziness. It has been convinced that fuzziness does not absolutely mean imprecision, nor does it consequentially result in troubles. Philosophers of natural language now consider fuzziness to be neither a marginal nor a problematic phenomenon. They think fuzziness has great importance because of its convenience and efficiency in everyday communication.
The paper includes five parts. It begins with an introduction of fuzziness . The first part  presents a very detailed studies on language fuzziness .It gives definition of fuzziness and makes a careful comparation between the fuzziness of word meaning and ambiguity, generality etc. The second part talks about the origin of the fuzziness of language . In the third chapter we analyze the fuzziness of word meaning from the perspective of semantics and pragmatics. The fourth chapter deals with the use of fuzzy language.

1  Recent study of the fuzziness
Fuzziness is original and attentively studied by philosophers and logicians, receiving increasing philosophical and logic attention. As a product of nature and human brains, language itself has the necessity to be exact and clear all the time, espectially in the process of communication, whether in written or spoken form, but fuzziness is aslo one of the characteristics of the natural language. In 1965 L.A.Zadeh published the historic paper Fuzzy Sets, fuzziness study comes to form its own discipline, such as fuzzy linguistics. He is the first person who puts forward the theory of fuzzy sets. From then on, both domestic and foreign linguistics make great efforts into studying fuzziness based on Fuzzy Set. Ever after, linguistists make systematic researches on the fuzzy languge. Channell thinks that fuzziness in language neither all“bad” or all“good”used in many ways. It shows she makes fuzziness into psychological causes, since "indefiniteness of this sort in perceptions, memories, beliefs and intentions is sometimes described as vagueness."[1] She aslo thinks that fuzziness is both a linguistic phenomenon, and a pragmatic matter. Burns agrees with D. Lewis’s view that "language themselves are free of fuzziness but the linguistic conventions of a population or the linguistic habits of a person select not a point but a fuzzy region in the space of precise languages"[2].


1. 1 Definition
While linguistists have reached a consensus on the issue that fuzziness is a natural attribute of language, they disagree with the definition of fuzziness. Both in China and abroad, the following defined is more representative.C.S.Peirce thinks when there are several states by any possibility, though the speakers consider these states carefully, in fact, they can’t decide whether the state is inside or outside this proposition, at this moment, this proposition is fuzzy. Crystal and Davy think that the fuzziness of languge indicates the uncertainity when analying one element of linguistics or form.
Most scholars in China are intrested in defining fuzziness and distinguishing between fuzziness, ambiguity, generality, and discussing characteristics of semantic fuzziness, the root of fuzziness. Scholars at home mostly research vagueness from semantic point of view, but few scholars at home study from pragmatics. The relational studies include He Ziran, Yu Dongmin, Li Jinxi, IA Yongzhong, Dai Jiandong, Li Qiumei, Xu Minhui, Shi Yu, Lin Bo and Wang Wenbin, Wu Bingzhang and Zhang Siyong.转贴于 酷文网-论文下载中心 http://www.coolwen.net


共8页: 上一页 1 [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] 下一页

网摘收藏:
 -> 在百度中搜索:词义的模糊性探讨(英文)
 -> 在Google中搜索:词义的模糊性探讨(英文)
免责声明 | 关于我们 | 广告联系 | 友情链接 | 网站地图 | 共同合作
免费论文 毕业论文 毕业论文范文 酷文网(www.coolwen.net) 版权所有 coolwen.net 2007,All Rights Reserved
E-mail:hui_love#tom.com(为防止垃圾邮件请把#换成@) 点击这里给我发消息 点击这里给我发消息
湘ICP备07003917号