简析传记作品的文学属性及其文学价值(英文)

Conclusion
For over a hundred years, there is a long history for biographical creations, but in history, many theorists think that no species of literature work seems more worthy of cultivation than biography. No other form can more certainly enchain the heart by irresistible interest. People become more and more interested in whether the biographical works should be created by literature skills and they also become interested in how important literature art in biographical works. We know biography is a special type of literature and it today is at the forefront of literary culture, and it has become the most popular. Because that nonfiction works has become a new and popular literature area. There are two reasons for its becoming popular. The first one is that the limitation of knowledge, our elders created a world which was full of imagination and fiction in the literature works in order to comprehend the real world, but through the long historic period, people found that if we use the real experiences to lead our life direction, which will help us to gain more knowledge of real life. The second one is that the literature works of fiction have been explored for a long period. The background and contents of this kind of works had been created frequently enough, and it is hard for us to have original and brand new idea to create the literature works of fiction.
If we believe that the biography will play an important role in literature creation, we should believe that biography has more valuable literature function and we should make use of this great function to improve our approach and outlook to the outside world, enhance our heart empty, and broaden our knowledge of the human beings. The author thinks that if we want to take full advantage of the value of the biography, we should turn the biography works into an art, and add literature art creation skills to the biographical works. Because only the biographical works are full of art beauty they can be more impressive and worthy to be read.
In this paper, the author just only discusses the literature art of biographical works, but how to create literature art in such kind of works is not mentioned, thus, the author hopes that more and more biographical theorists will turn to study this aspect. 

References
[1] Nigel Hamilton.Biography:A Brief History[M].Boston:Harvard University Press,2007:
11.
[2] Greg Clingham.Samuel Johnson[M].Shanghai:Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press,2000:26.
[3] 白志坚.试论传记文学的艺术性[J].集宁师专学报,2001,(2):17-19.
[4] 董小玉.文学创作与审美心理[M].成都:四川教育出版社,1992:134.
[5] 歌德.论文学艺术[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2005:89.
[6] 刘海峰,王成军.莫洛亚传记美学初探[J].外国文学研究,2002,(2):20-22.
[7] 钱谷融,鲁枢元.文学心理学[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2003:33.
[8] 宋薇.钱穆文学美学思想论述[J].河北大学学报,2004,(6):4-7.
[9] 许菁频.百年传记文学理论研究综述[J].学术界,2006,(5):9-11.
[10] 郑笑平.我国新时期传记文学美学特征浅析[J].河北师范大学学报,2004,(5):22-24.
[11] 朱兴榜.传记文学理论研究的突破[J].沙洋师范高等专科学校校报,2005,(5):12-14.
[12] 孙勇彬.鲍斯威尔的《约翰生传》研究述评[J].外国文学研究,2004,(2):14-17.
[13] 郭永麟.应该给予传记文学独立的文体地位[J].重庆社会科学,2007(3):18-21.
[14] 朱文华.传记文学作品的史学性质与文学手法的度[J].理论与创作,2007,(2):27.
[15] 郭久麟.史学与文学的有机结合[J].重庆社会科学,2002,(2):13-15
[16] Tan yingzhou.New Books INFO[J].English Language Learning, 2007,(12).
[17] 辜也平.论郁达夫传记文学的“文学”取向[J].浙江师范大学学报,2007.
[18] 胡山林.文学与人生[M].开封:河南大学出版社,2006.
[19] 扬正润.传记的界线——史学、文学与心理学的考察[J].荆门职业技术学院
     学报,2007,(6).
[20] 俞樟华.论传记文学的艺术加工[J].浙江师范大学学报,2007,(6).