上述研究的共同特点是就舞弊公司与未舞弊公司之间治理机制特征的区别提供了经验证据，它们共同表明了在舞弊公司和未舞弊公司的审计委员会和董事会构成之间存在着一些重要的差异。
【参考文献】
［1］马尔特白，威尔金森.死胡同：利害相关社会与英国的公司治理［J］.经济社会体制比较.1999，（3）。
［2］Thomsen, Pedersen. Ownership Structure an Economic PerformanceIn The Langagest
European Companies［J］. Strategic ManagementJournal, 2000.
［3］Crutchley et al. Agency Problems and the Simultaneityof Financial Decision Making
The Role of InstitutionalOwnership［J］. International Review of Financial Analysis, 1999,(3).
［4］Shleifer, Vishny. A Survey of Corporate Governance［J］. The Journal of Finance, 1997, (2).
［5］Simerly, Li. Environmental Dynamism, CapitalStructure and
Performance: A Theoretical Integration and AnEmpirical Test ［J］. Strategic
Management Journal, 2000.
［6］Klein. Firm Performance and Committee Structure［J］.Journal of Law and Economics, 1998(April).
［7］Nikos Vafeas. Board Meeting Frequency and FirmPerformance［J］. Journal of Financial Economics, 1999.
［8］Ellen, Thomas, Peter. Executive Compensation Issuesand Research［J］. Journal of Accounting Literature, 1993.
［9］Agrawal, Knoeber. Firm performance and mechanismsto control agency problems
between managers and shareholders［J］. Journal of Finacial and Quantitative Analysis, 1996.
［10］Baliga, Moyer and Rao. CEO Duality and Firmperformance: What's the Fuss?［J］. Strategic ManagementJournal, 1996, (1).
［11］Rechner, Dalton. CEO Duality and OrganizationalPerformance: A Longitudinal
Analysis［J］. Strategic ManagementJournal, 1991.
［12］John. Corporate Govemance and Disclosure Quality［J］. Accounting and Bussiness Research, 1992(Spring).
［13］Carcello, and L. Neal. auditcommittee composition andauditor reporting［J］. Accounting Review 75(October), 2000.
转贴于 酷文网-论文下载中心 http://www.coolwen.net
共5页: 上一页 [1] [2] [3] [4] 5 下一页
网摘收藏:
当前位置:
载入中...
-> 在百度中搜索：
-> 在Google中搜索：